|
home > training > conferences > Chemical and Water Safety in Rural Central and Eastern Europe |
Chemical and Water Safety in Rural Central and Eastern EuropeSeptember 6-8, 2002 Topics of DiscussionThe theme of this conference/workshop was Chemical and Water Safety in Rural Central and Eastern Europe. Each country delegation was asked to provide an overview on issues related to water quality and water pollution in rural areas, particularly with respect to agricultural chemicals (i.e. pesticides). In addition, several research studies relevant to the topic and to all the countries represented were presented. ParticipantsCo-Chairs
Keynote Speakers
Country Delegation Presenters
Discussants
Presentation SummariesEU Accession Countries Facing Environmental Health ChallengesThis presentation by Dr. Tompa outlined the process of developing an Institute for Chemical Safety in Hungary that would coordinate with other national agencies and be responsive to the requirements for harmonization necessary for entry into the European Union. Status of the Epidemiology of Pesticide Poisoning ProjectDr. Bisbelli from the WHO Programme on Chemical Safety described the study which aims to estimate the extent of human exposure and poisoning in various countries, to implement preventive and educational strategies, and to reduce the morbidity and mortality related to pesticide poisoning. Country Report from SloveniaDr. Macarol-Hiti focused on recent legislation in Slovenia concerning drinking water; outlining the responsible authorities in the government and how the legislation is monitored. She also provided a comparison of rural versus urban water supplies (number of consumers and quality of water). Nitrate and atrazine levels in rural and urban supplies over the last seven years were shown. Country Report from the Czech RepublicDr. Koziseck discussed the quality of drinking water in rural communities in the Czech Republic in terms of the sources of data, private well-water quality, and small public water supply systems. Microbiological indicators of quality that were used included E. coli, C. perfringens, and cryptosporidium. Chemical indicators were also discussed, including those which have exceeded the limits. Dr. Koziseck’s conclusions were that targeted screenings will help to maintain compliance with legislation and improve water quality for the rural population. Country Report from RomaniaProfessor Bocsan described the water situation in rural Romania, where only about 18% of the drinking water is from a central water supplying system. Problems of deteriorating water sources and the inability to monitor and control water sources leads to many people being exposed to chemical and biological contaminants. Field surveys have shown that nitrate concentrations in the ground water exceeded 45 mg/L in more than 28% of the tested wells. GIS methods are being applied to allow better and faster causal inference so that preventive and control measures can be applied. Country Report from PolandDr. Hanke reported on the proportion of households using municible and private water sources and rural water contamination problems. A high percentage of familes are engaged in vegetable gardening for family consumption. He described the level of pesticide and fertilizer use; methods for registration and professional application of pesticides; regulation of pesticide application and compliance; activities for risk reduction; risk assessment methods and adoption of good work and assessment practices. Also a short review of data on disparities of cas3es of hematologic cancers, including leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and multiple myeloma in rural populations versus urban populations; incidence of acute toxic reactions to agricultural chemicals; and waste management in rural areas. Country Report from the Slovak RepublicDr. Trnovec provided a general overview of the drinking water status which situated the severity of current problems of the Central and Eastern European countries and of the Slovak Republic. Slovakia has reached a stage of acquiring most of the legal regulations and framework needed for ensuring environmental protection, but enforcement remains an issue. He discussed the most recent challenges for a Slovak water resources policy, and cited the worst polluters (intensive agriculture and the chemical industry). He discussed water quality monitoring as well as what is still needed concerning public sewerage systems; the important laws and regulations; and strategies for CEE countries for the new future. Country Report from HungaryDr. Paldy reviewed important ministerial conferences on environment and health, focusing on the NEHAP (National Environmental Health Action Plan) programs’ goals, tools and strategic elements. She then looked specifically at Hungarian NEHAP subprograms, which include water quality. Arsenic contamination of ground water is one of the biggest problems in Hungary, affecting more than half of the population. Hungary’s greatest success story to date is the dramatic decrease, since the late 1970s, of cases of methemoglobinemia.. The use of GIS mapping showed the distribution of various diseases as well as those areas with unacceptable drinking water due to coliform, ammonium content, iron, arsenic and manganese Chemical Pesticide Contamination in Waters of the RegionDr. Tomas Trnovec reported on the condition of the Danube River Basin, shared watershed of a large part of the Central and Eastern European Region. A PHARE project evaluated the risks of pesticide application to humans and aquatic life in the region and made recommendations concerning legal management and policy measures. Water Quality and Health Concerns in Rural Village with Emphasis on Nitrate ContaminationDr. Catherine Zeman looked at nitrates in rural well water and reported on a series of studies that she conducted in the Transylvania region of Romania that were concerned with nitrate contamination of private wells and of outbreaks of methemoglobinemia in village areas. She looked at related contaminants. DiscussionsDiscussions were held following the country reports. General procedural topics
Discussions concerning research areas that need attention
Issues for working collaboratively
Other action areas
ConclusionThis group will plan to meet again in two years, with an offer from the Romanian colleagues to host the workshop in Transylvania. |
|
Research and Training in Occupational and Environmental Health in Rural Regions of the World |